The
Imagined Gift Of Submission
Author: Screamer © 1998 |
I’m not going to say I’ve
always been into BDSM. I am, however, going to say that my earliest fantasies
were such that would lead me to believe I knew along that this was the
kind of lifestyle I wanted. I can remember being about seven or eight,
and shutting myself into my closet. I would pretend I was the kidnapped princess, and that the thieves that had captured me wanted me to do all sorts of ‘things’ with them. Now, at seven or eight, I didn’t know what ‘things’ they meant, but I certainly knew what part of my body they were going to do them to. I would spend hours in that closet. I think that’s when my parents started to worry. Now, at the ripe old age of 33, here I am. I am a submissive
with a wonderful Dominant. I am a Top, beginning explorations of dominating
others. I am a stepmother, a computer geek, a great cook, and a housecleaner
for four. In addition, I run a BDSM website, write fiction and non-fiction,
and spend a great My submission is not a gift to anyone but myself. When you bloom and blossom in the on-line community, (as opposed to those who discover BDSM before they got a computer) the way I did, you begin with very certain beliefs. You start out thinking that when you submit to a Dominant, you’re giving him some great gift, and for that you should be cherished, loved and held above any other life form on the planet. You want him or her to use you to satiate his or her desires, but you want them to do so in such a manner that elevates your status. You want to be owned by someone who appreciates this gift of submission you offer them. Right? HA ! I’ve been arguing this theory in the online community
for years. It does me no good. People are going to see it as they wish
to see it. The plan, simple fact of the matter is this: If a submissive
is allowing the Dominant to do things to/for/with her, she obviously
wants to do them as well, correct? Maybe not in such a I know that when I take a hand spanking from Mark, I am most certainly NOT enjoying the pain from it. I hate hand spankings. They hurt. I can’t eroticize that one little iota. However, I continue to take them, and after the pain is over, I’m happy that I did. Why? Did I give him a gift of submission? Did I take it out of pure selflessness? No. I did it because he likes it, and because giving your partner something he likes, even when you don’t, is part of any healthy relationship. I do get something out of it, though. I get the pleasure of pleasing him. I get the happiness I feel when I look at him when it’s over, and I see the pride and love in his eyes for me. I get to make him happy. If it’s a gift for either of us, it’s for both of us. Mark doesn’t always like romantic movies. But he’ll watch them sometimes, with and for me. Is that a gift? No. Because usually when it’s over, he turns on something with Steven Segall in it, and we watch that together. That’s an exchange. Not a gift. Okay, maybe a gift exchange. I think all this talk about ‘the gift of submission’ irks me the way that it does, is that it goes against what I feel submission is. It makes it appear as if the Dominant owes you something. As if you’re doing something without any thought to your own needs, wishes, and desires. That’s not true. You wouldn’t be a submissive if you didn’t want to be one. You’re doing what feels good and natural to you. You’re not making any sacrifices that you didn’t sign on to make. And you’re not doing anything different than our mothers and fathers before us did. You’re giving something to get something in return. Relationships that last are giving relationships. This
is true in vanilla as well as the kink community. Your mother liked
tearjerker movies, your father liked westerns. I’m imagining that if
they survived the curve and have stayed married all these years, it’s
because they did a lot of compromising and giving to each BDSM is no different. The Dominant gives his dominance. The submissive gives
her submission. The two feed off of each other, making the other and
their own stronger and more meaningful over time. Two pieces of the
same puzzle, drawn together by some invisible force that allows each
half to be in their natural state, and allows the That’s all there is to it. I worry about submissives that hold their ‘gift’ in their lap, saving it for a perfect Dominant. I worry about them because as long as they keep thinking of their chosen lifestyle as a gift, they’re going to continue to sit there with it – alone. I don’t know about anyone else, but the last thing I want kneeling in front of me is a submissive who thinks that he or she is doing me some great favor by being there for me to dominate. I don’t need favors. I need a strong, proud submissive. Someone who looks to me as I look to them for making an intimate connection into this lifestyle we have chosen to call our own. Now, don’t get me wrong. I’m not saying that submission
should not be cherished. What I’m trying to get across is that it should
be just as cherished as Dominance. I mean, come on. What good does your
submission do you if you keep it all to yourself, and don’t share it
with a Dominant? And the reverse is I’m not about to put myself up on a pedestal and proclaim that I am a submissive, and should be treated with the utmost respect and love because I submit. I’m not going to elevate myself to a level that makes me seem better or more holy. Why? Because I’m not. I’m doing exactly what I want to be doing, and with whom I want to be doing it with. And I can give as well as I get. And if you’re not doing something that ‘does’ it for you in the long run, you’re doing the wrong damn thing. I give that gift to myself. |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||